🔗 Share this article

Do your LinkedIn connections recognizing you as a industry expert? Do numerous commenters applauding your insights on expanding your business? Do recruiters making contact to discuss opportunities?

Should that not be the case, the reason might be that you're not male.

The Experiment: Changing Gender Identity to achieve Better Visibility

Numerous female professionals participated in an organized professional network test this week after popular discussions indicated that changing their profile gender to "male" boosted their platform visibility.

Other testers modified their profiles to include what they called "masculine-oriented" terminology - adding results-driven business buzzwords like "propel", "transform" and "accelerate". Based on reports, their exposure similarly increased.

Algorithmic Bias Concerns Brought Up

The improved metrics has caused some to wonder whether an inherent sexism in LinkedIn's algorithm prioritizes men who employ professional networking terminology.

Like many large networking sites, LinkedIn utilizes an algorithm to determine which posts are shown to which users - promoting some while suppressing others.

Company Statement

Through a company announcement, LinkedIn recognized the trend but stated it does not factor in "demographic information" when determining content distribution. Rather, the company explained that "numerous factors" affect how content perform.

Changing gender on your profile does not influence how your posts shows up in search or feed.

Individual Results

Simone Bonnett, who modified her pronouns to "he/him" and her name to "Simon E", described remarkable outcomes.

"The statistics I'm seeing indicate a 1,600% increase in visitor traffic and a 1,300% increase in content views," she noted.

Megan Cornish, a marketing expert, started testing after observing her audience decrease substantially.

The Method

• Initially, she changed her profile gender to "man"
• Then, she used artificial intelligence to rewrite her profile using "masculine-oriented" wording
• Finally, she recycled previous content with comparable "agentic" style

The result was instantaneous: a more than fourfold rise in reach within seven days.

The Downside

Although the positive results, Cornish expressed unhappiness with the method.

"Before, my posts were softer - brief and clever, but also warm and relatable," she stated. "Currently, the masculine version was assertive and self-assured - like a white male being overly confident."

She discontinued the test after seven days, saying "Every day I persisted, and outcomes improved, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Some participants experienced positive results. Cass Cooper who changed both her gender to "male" and her ethnicity to "white" described a reduction in visibility and engagement.

"We understand there's systemic preference, but it's extremely difficult to comprehend how it operates in particular situations or the reasons behind it," she remarked.

Wider Consequences

These experiments occur alongside ongoing conversations about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a professional network and social space.

Recent changes in recent months have apparently resulted in women professionals experiencing significantly reduced visibility, leading to informal experiments where identical content by male and female users received vastly different reach.

Technical Explanation

Per LinkedIn, the network uses AI systems to categorize and spread content based on multiple factors, including post content and the member's career profile.

The company claims it frequently assesses its systems, including "examinations of inequalities based on gender."

A spokesperson suggested that current reductions in certain members' visibility might stem from higher volume due to more content on the platform.

Evolving Environment

According to a tester noted, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the network.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more businesslike and polished," she commented. "This is evolving. It's becoming increasingly aggressive and less controlled."